- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ACW-5054 vs 4K
Denver ACW-5054 vs Klack 4K
What ACW-5054 does better (1) and where 4K wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is ACW-5054 better than 4K?
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.33″+50%
Why is 4K better than ACW-5054?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/1.3" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.77″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | — |
| Max field of view | 140° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.33″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
