LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. Osmo Action 3 vs 2.0 WiFi

DJI Osmo Action 3 vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi

What Osmo Action 3 does better (4) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (3) — every spec side by side.

DJI Osmo Action 3
DJI · 2022Osmo Action 3
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $210
Higher score
vs
Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
Water Wolf · 20242.0 WiFi
7.0Score
3 advantages≈ $110
8.6Video2.0
5.6Photo2.8
8.7Ruggedness9.8
9.1Battery7.9

Why is Osmo Action 3 better than 2.0 WiFi?

  1. Max video resolution4K vs 2.5K
  2. Sensor size (optical format)0.59″ vs 0.33″+77%
  3. Battery capacity1,770 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+77%
  4. Max field of view155° vs 116°+34%

Why is 2.0 WiFi better than Osmo Action 3?

  1. Waterproof without case16 m vs 100 m6.2×
  2. Battery life (recording)160 min vs 240 min+50%
  3. Aperturef/2.8 vs f/2+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Design & durability
Weight145 g—
Width70.5 mm—
Height44.2 mm—
Depth32.8 mm—
Waterproof without case16 m100 m
Waterproof with housing60 m—
Min operating temperature-20 °C—
Max operating temperature45 °C—
Video
Max video resolution4K2.5K
4K frame rate (max)120 fps—
Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps—
Max video bitrate130 Mbps—
HDR videoYes—
H.265 / HEVCYes—
Timelapse / hyperlapseYes—
Sensor & photo
Sensor size1/1.7"1/3"
Sensor size (optical format)0.59″0.33″
Photo resolution12 MP—
Aperturef/2.8f/2
Max field of view155°116°
RAW photosYes—
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemRockSteady 3.0, RockSteady+, HorizonBalancing—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
360° horizon lockYes—
Screens
Front screenYes—
Main screen size2.25″—
Front screen size1.4″—
TouchscreenYes—
Audio
Microphones3—
External microphone supportYes—
Battery
Battery capacity1,770 mAh1,000 mAh
Battery energy6.8 Wh—
Battery life (recording)160 min240 min
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Live streamingYes—
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
Max memory card256 GB—
Voice controlYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare