LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. Osmo Action vs X3.2

DJI Osmo Action vs Lamax X3.2

What Osmo Action does better (4) and where X3.2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

DJI Osmo Action
DJI · 2019Osmo Action
7.6Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
Lamax X3.2
LamaxX3.2
2 advantages≈ $1,400
6.9Battery7.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Osmo ActionX3.2
65 × 423560 × 4433
Osmo ActionX3.2Difference
Height42 mm44 mm−2 mm
Width65 mm60 mm+5 mm
Depth35 mm33 mm+2 mm
Weight124 g65 g+59 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Osmo Action better than X3.2?

  1. Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
  2. Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
  3. Main screen size2.25″ vs 2″+12%
  4. Battery capacity1,300 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+8%

Why is X3.2 better than Osmo Action?

  1. Weight124 g vs 65 g+91%
  2. Depth35 mm vs 33 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Lamax X3.2Lamax X3.2≈ $1,400
Design & durability
Weight124 g65 g
Width65 mm60 mm
Height42 mm44 mm
Depth35 mm33 mm
Waterproof without case11 m—
Waterproof with housing—40 m
Min operating temperature-10 °C—
Max operating temperature40 °C—
Video
Max video resolution4K2.7K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps—
Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps120 fps
Max video bitrate100 Mbps—
HDR videoYes—
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Sensor size1/2.3"—
Sensor size (optical format)0.44″—
Photo resolution12 MP12 MP
Aperturef/2.8—
Max field of view145°—
RAW photosYes—
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
Screens
Front screenYes—
Main screen size2.25″2″
Front screen size1.4″—
TouchscreenYes—
Battery
Battery capacity1,300 mAh1,200 mAh
Battery energy5 Wh—
Battery life (recording)135 min135 min
Charging time90 min—
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
Max memory card256 GB128 GB
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare