- Clippertoday
- Compare
- VIRB Ultra 30 vs Full HD PRO V2
Garmin VIRB Ultra 30 vs Jamara Full HD PRO V2
What VIRB Ultra 30 does better (4) and where Full HD PRO V2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
VIRB Ultra 30Full HD PRO V2
| VIRB Ultra 30 | Full HD PRO V2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45.9 mm | 29.8 mm | +16.1 mm |
| Width | 57.5 mm | 59.2 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Depth | 31.3 mm | 41 mm | −9.7 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 58 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VIRB Ultra 30 better than Full HD PRO V2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 1080p
- Max frame rate (slow motion)300 fps vs 120 fps2.5×
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
- Depth31.3 mm vs 41 mm+31%
Why is Full HD PRO V2 better than VIRB Ultra 30?
- Weight88 g vs 58 g+52%
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 88 g | 58 g |
| Width | 57.5 mm | 59.2 mm |
| Height | 45.9 mm | 29.8 mm |
| Depth | 31.3 mm | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 300 fps | 120 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Digitale Bildstabilisierung (DIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1.75″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
