- Clippertoday
- Compare
- VIRB Ultra 30 vs W9.1
Garmin VIRB Ultra 30 vs Lamax W9.1
What VIRB Ultra 30 does better (4) and where W9.1 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Video8.0
4.2Ruggedness8.9
7.8Battery7.4
2.3Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
VIRB Ultra 30W9.1
| VIRB Ultra 30 | W9.1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45.9 mm | 42 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Width | 57.5 mm | 64 mm | −6.5 mm |
| Depth | 31.3 mm | 32 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 127 g | −39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VIRB Ultra 30 better than W9.1?
- Weight88 g vs 127 g+44%
- Battery life (recording)135 min vs 120 min+12%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)300 fps vs 240 fps+25%
- Depth31.3 mm vs 32 mm+2%
Why is W9.1 better than VIRB Ultra 30?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 12 m
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 20 MP+67%
- Main screen size1.75″ vs 2″+14%
- Battery capacity1,250 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 88 g | 127 g |
| Width | 57.5 mm | 64 mm |
| Height | 45.9 mm | 42 mm |
| Depth | 31.3 mm | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 12 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 300 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Digitale Bildstabilisierung (DIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 1.75″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
