- Clippertoday
- Compare
- VIRB Ultra 30 vs Muvi KX-1
Garmin VIRB Ultra 30 vs Veho Muvi KX-1
What VIRB Ultra 30 does better (2) and where Muvi KX-1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Video4.0
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
VIRB Ultra 30Muvi KX-1
| VIRB Ultra 30 | Muvi KX-1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45.9 mm | 40 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Width | 57.5 mm | 52 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Depth | 31.3 mm | 26 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 67 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VIRB Ultra 30 better than Muvi KX-1?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)300 fps vs 60 fps5×
- Battery capacity1,250 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+19%
Why is Muvi KX-1 better than VIRB Ultra 30?
- Weight88 g vs 67 g+31%
- Main screen size1.75″ vs 1.8″+3%
- Depth31.3 mm vs 26 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 88 g | 67 g |
| Width | 57.5 mm | 52 mm |
| Height | 45.9 mm | 40 mm |
| Depth | 31.3 mm | 26 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 300 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Digitale Bildstabilisierung (DIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1.75″ | 1.8″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
