- Clippertoday
- Compare
- GO 2 vs C200
Insta360 GO 2 vs SJCAM C200
What GO 2 does better (2) and where C200 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GO 2C200
| GO 2 | C200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 24 mm | 34 mm | −10 mm |
| Width | 53 mm | 68 mm | −15 mm |
| Depth | 21 mm | 26.5 mm | −5.5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GO 2 better than C200?
- Sensor size (optical format)0.44″ vs 0.36″+22%
- Depth21 mm vs 26.5 mm+26%
Why is C200 better than GO 2?
- Max video resolution2.7K vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
- Waterproof without case4 m vs 5 m+25%
- Min operating temperature-10 °C vs -20 °C+-50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 27 g | — |
| Width | 53 mm | 68 mm |
| Height | 24 mm | 34 mm |
| Depth | 21 mm | 26.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 4 m | 5 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Min operating temperature | -10 °C | -20 °C |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | 60 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.7K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 24 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 240 fps |
| Max video bitrate | 80 Mbps | — |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.8" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.44″ | 0.36″ |
| Photo resolution | 3 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Max field of view | — | 154° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | FlowState | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 1.28″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,100 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 150 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
