LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. ONE X2 vs QooCam EGO

Insta360 ONE X2 vs Kandao QooCam EGO

What ONE X2 does better (4) and where QooCam EGO wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Insta360 ONE X2
Insta360 · 2020ONE X2
6.8Score
4 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Kandao QooCam EGO
Kandao · 2022QooCam EGO
4 advantages≈ $270
5.9Photo5.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

ONE X2QooCam EGO
46.2 × 11329.894 × 52.822
ONE X2QooCam EGODifference
Height113 mm52.8 mm+60.2 mm
Width46.2 mm94 mm−47.8 mm
Depth29.8 mm22 mm+7.8 mm
Weight149 g160 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ONE X2 better than QooCam EGO?

  1. Max video resolution5.7K vs 1080p
  2. Max field of view360° vs 79°4.6×
  3. Weight149 g vs 160 g+7%
  4. Battery capacity1,630 mAh vs 1,340 mAh+22%

Why is QooCam EGO better than ONE X2?

  1. Main screen size1″ vs 2.54″2.5×
  2. Max frame rate (slow motion)50 fps vs 60 fps+20%
  3. Depth29.8 mm vs 22 mm+35%
  4. Aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Insta360 ONE X2Insta360 ONE X2≈ $2006.8
Design & durability
Weight149 g160 g
Width46.2 mm94 mm
Height113 mm52.8 mm
Depth29.8 mm22 mm
Waterproof without case10 m—
Video
Max video resolution5.7K1080p
4K frame rate (max)50 fps—
Max frame rate (slow motion)50 fps60 fps
Max video bitrate100 Mbps—
Log colour profileYes—
HDR videoYes—
H.265 / HEVCYesYes
Timelapse / hyperlapseYes—
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution18 MP—
Aperturef/2f/1.8
Max field of view360°79°
Lenses2—
RAW photosYesYes
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemFlowState6-Achsen Stabilisation
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Main screen size1″2.54″
TouchscreenYesYes
Audio
Microphones4—
External microphone supportYes—
Battery
Battery capacity1,630 mAh1,340 mAh
Battery life (recording)80 min—
Charging time85 min—
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Webcam modeYes—
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
Voice controlYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare