- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Pro 2.0 vs QooCam 8K
Insta360 Pro 2.0 vs Kandao QooCam 8K
What Pro 2.0 does better (2) and where QooCam 8K wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Pro 2.0 better than QooCam 8K?
- Photo resolution60 MP vs 20 MP3×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh+67%
Why is QooCam 8K better than Pro 2.0?
- Weight1,550 g vs 245 g6.3×
- Aperturef/2.4 vs f/2+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 1,550 g | 245 g |
| Width | — | 145 mm |
| Height | — | 57 mm |
| Depth | — | 33 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 35 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 8K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.59″ |
| Photo resolution | 60 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 360° | — |
| RAW photos | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2.4″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 45 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
