- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Pro 2.0 vs Theta Z1
Insta360 Pro 2.0 vs Ricoh Theta Z1
What Pro 2.0 does better (4) and where Theta Z1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Pro 2.0 better than Theta Z1?
- 4K frame rate (max)120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Max video resolution8K vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Photo resolution60 MP vs 23 MP2.6×
Why is Theta Z1 better than Pro 2.0?
- Weight1,550 g vs 182 g8.5×
- Aperturef/2.4 vs f/2.1+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 1,550 g | 182 g |
| Width | — | 132.5 mm |
| Height | — | 48 mm |
| Depth | — | 29.7 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 1″ |
| Photo resolution | 60 MP | 23 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.1 |
| Max field of view | 360° | — |
| RAW photos | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | 3-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 0.93″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 60 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
