- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Full HD Pro WiFi V2 vs X9.2
Jamara Full HD Pro WiFi V2 vs Lamax X9.2
What Full HD Pro WiFi V2 does better (1) and where X9.2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Full HD Pro WiFi V2X9.2
| Full HD Pro WiFi V2 | X9.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 55 mm | 44 mm | +11 mm |
| Width | 84 mm | 60 mm | +24 mm |
| Depth | 86 mm | 33 mm | +53 mm |
| Weight | 58 g | 65 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Full HD Pro WiFi V2 better than X9.2?
- Weight58 g vs 65 g+12%
Why is X9.2 better than Full HD Pro WiFi V2?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
- Depth86 mm vs 33 mm2.6×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+17%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 58 g | 65 g |
| Width | 84 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 55 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 86 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | — | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
