- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Full HD Pro WiFi V2 vs H3
Jamara Full HD Pro WiFi V2 vs Midland H3
What Full HD Pro WiFi V2 does better (1) and where H3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Photo4.2
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Full HD Pro WiFi V2H3
| Full HD Pro WiFi V2 | H3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 55 mm | 29.3 mm | +25.7 mm |
| Width | 84 mm | 59.3 mm | +24.7 mm |
| Depth | 86 mm | 41.1 mm | +44.9 mm |
| Weight | 58 g | 53 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Full HD Pro WiFi V2 better than H3?
- Max field of view170° vs 120°+42%
Why is H3 better than Full HD Pro WiFi V2?
- Weight58 g vs 53 g+9%
- Depth86 mm vs 41.1 mm2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 58 g | 53 g |
| Width | 84 mm | 59.3 mm |
| Height | 55 mm | 29.3 mm |
| Depth | 86 mm | 41.1 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
