- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Full HD Pro WiFi V2 vs H5 Pro
Jamara Full HD Pro WiFi V2 vs Midland H5 Pro
What Full HD Pro WiFi V2 does better (1) and where H5 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Photo4.2
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Full HD Pro WiFi V2H5 Pro
| Full HD Pro WiFi V2 | H5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 55 mm | 41 mm | +14 mm |
| Width | 84 mm | 59 mm | +25 mm |
| Depth | 86 mm | 23 mm | +63 mm |
| Weight | 58 g | 58 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Full HD Pro WiFi V2 better than H5 Pro?
- Max field of view170° vs 120°+42%
Why is H5 Pro better than Full HD Pro WiFi V2?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Depth86 mm vs 23 mm3.7×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 58 g | 58 g |
| Width | 84 mm | 59 mm |
| Height | 55 mm | 41 mm |
| Depth | 86 mm | 23 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
