- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Full HD Pro WiFi V2 vs AC4K 120
Jamara Full HD Pro WiFi V2 vs Renkforce AC4K 120
What Full HD Pro WiFi V2 does better (4) and where AC4K 120 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Photo2.1
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Full HD Pro WiFi V2AC4K 120
| Full HD Pro WiFi V2 | AC4K 120 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 55 mm | 41 mm | +14 mm |
| Width | 84 mm | 59 mm | +25 mm |
| Depth | 86 mm | 24.5 mm | +61.5 mm |
| Weight | 58 g | 64 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Full HD Pro WiFi V2 better than AC4K 120?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 10 fps12×
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 2 MP8×
- Weight58 g vs 64 g+10%
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
Why is AC4K 120 better than Full HD Pro WiFi V2?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Depth86 mm vs 24.5 mm3.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 58 g | 64 g |
| Width | 84 mm | 59 mm |
| Height | 55 mm | 41 mm |
| Depth | 86 mm | 24.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 10 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 10 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 2 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 180 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
