- Clippertoday
- Compare
- PanoX V2 vs C100
Labpano PanoX V2 vs SJCAM C100
What PanoX V2 does better (2) and where C100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PanoX V2C100
| PanoX V2 | C100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 50 mm | 26 mm | +24 mm |
| Width | 134 mm | 60 mm | +74 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 20 mm | = |
| Weight | 200 g | 40 g | +160 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PanoX V2 better than C100?
- Max video resolution8K vs 4K
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
Why is C100 better than PanoX V2?
- Weight200 g vs 40 g5×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 40 g |
| Width | 134 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 50 mm | 26 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| Min operating temperature | 0 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 72 MP | — |
| Max field of view | 360° | — |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 3″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery energy | — | 2.7 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 150 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
