- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W9.1 vs 11s Plus
Lamax W9.1 vs Rollei 11s Plus
What W9.1 does better (6) and where 11s Plus wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
W9.111s Plus
| W9.1 | 11s Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 42 mm | 66 mm | −24 mm |
| Width | 64 mm | 44 mm | +20 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 33 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 127 g | 110 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W9.1 better than 11s Plus?
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 7 m+71%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 85 min+41%
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 13 MP+54%
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+35%
- Depth32 mm vs 33 mm+3%
Why is 11s Plus better than W9.1?
- Weight127 g vs 110 g+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | 110 g |
| Width | 64 mm | 44 mm |
| Height | 42 mm | 66 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 7 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/3.06" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 85 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
