- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W9.1 vs GA420
Lamax W9.1 vs WOLFANG GA420
What W9.1 does better (2) and where GA420 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is W9.1 better than GA420?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 10 m+20%
Why is GA420 better than W9.1?
GA420 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | — |
| Width | 64 mm | — |
| Height | 42 mm | — |
| Depth | 32 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 10 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
