- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W9.2 vs 7
Lamax W9.2 vs National Geographic 7
What W9.2 does better (2) and where 7 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
W9.27
| W9.2 | 7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 42 mm | 33 mm | +9 mm |
| Width | 64 mm | 63 mm | +1 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 46 mm | −14 mm |
| Weight | 127 g | 95 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W9.2 better than 7?
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+29%
- Depth32 mm vs 46 mm+44%
Why is 7 better than W9.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 5K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Weight127 g vs 95 g+34%
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 15 m+25%
- Max field of view120° vs 170°+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | 95 g |
| Width | 64 mm | 63 mm |
| Height | 42 mm | 33 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 46 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 15 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.78" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.36″ |
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | 120° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.4″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
