LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. AT-M40R vs 7

Lipa AT-M40R vs National Geographic 7

What AT-M40R does better (2) and where 7 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Lipa AT-M40R
Lipa · 2024AT-M40R
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ $90
vs
National Geographic 7
National Geographic · 20247
8.5Score
1 advantage≈ $130
Higher score
9.4Video7.4
9.4Photo5.9
4.2Ruggedness9.3
3.0Features5.2

Why is AT-M40R better than 7?

  1. Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
  2. Photo resolution24 MP vs 20 MP+20%

Why is 7 better than AT-M40R?

  1. Waterproof without case0 m vs 15 m
Specifications

Side by side

Lipa AT-M40RLipa AT-M40R≈ $908.2
Design & durability
Weight—95 g
Width—63 mm
Height—33 mm
Depth—46 mm
Waterproof without case0 m15 m
Waterproof with housing30 m—
Video
Max video resolution5K5K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps120 fps
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Sensor size—1/2.78"
Sensor size (optical format)—0.36″
Photo resolution24 MP20 MP
Aperture—f/2.5
Max field of view170°170°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Front screenYesYes
Main screen size2″2″
Touchscreen—Yes
Audio
External microphone supportYes—
Battery
Battery capacity—1,050 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare