- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X5.2 vs XMIC
Lamax X5.2 vs Nilox XMIC
What X5.2 does better (4) and where XMIC wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X5.2XMIC
| X5.2 | XMIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 59 mm | −15 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 30 mm | +30 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 41 mm | −8 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 56 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X5.2 better than XMIC?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 900 mAh+33%
- Depth33 mm vs 41 mm+24%
Why is XMIC better than X5.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 5K
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Weight65 g vs 56 g+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | 56 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 30 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 59 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | HyperSmooth | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
