- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X5.2 vs SL3 4K
Lamax X5.2 vs Patona SL3 4K
What X5.2 does better (2) and where SL3 4K wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is X5.2 better than SL3 4K?
- Battery life (recording)135 min vs 90 min+50%
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+20%
Why is SL3 4K better than X5.2?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Main screen size2″ vs 3″+50%
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Max field of view120° vs 140°+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | — |
| Width | 60 mm | — |
| Height | 44 mm | — |
| Depth | 33 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | 120° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | HyperSmooth | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 3″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
