- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X5.2 vs C100 Pro
Lamax X5.2 vs SJCAM C100 Pro
What X5.2 does better (2) and where C100 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X5.2C100 Pro
| X5.2 | C100 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 20 mm | +24 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm | = |
| Depth | 33 mm | 26 mm | +7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X5.2 better than C100 Pro?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
Why is C100 Pro better than X5.2?
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 20 MP+67%
- Battery life (recording)135 min vs 148 min+10%
- Depth33 mm vs 26 mm+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | — |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 20 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 26 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | HyperSmooth | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | 148 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | 512 GB |
