- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X5.2 vs 4K
Lamax X5.2 vs Sunstech 4K
What X5.2 does better (3) and where 4K wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X5.24K
| X5.2 | 4K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 44 mm | = |
| Width | 60 mm | 61 mm | −1 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 32 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 62 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X5.2 better than 4K?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 900 mAh+33%
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
Why is 4K better than X5.2?
- Weight65 g vs 62 g+5%
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Max field of view120° vs 170°+42%
- Depth33 mm vs 32 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | 62 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 61 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/3.2" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.31″ |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | HyperSmooth | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
