- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X5.2 vs GO 2550 4k
Lamax X5.2 vs Trevi GO 2550 4k
What X5.2 does better (1) and where GO 2550 4k wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Video4.9
2.7Photo5.2
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
X5.2GO 2550 4k
| X5.2 | GO 2550 4k | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 43 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm | = |
| Depth | 33 mm | 31 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 86 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X5.2 better than GO 2550 4k?
- Weight65 g vs 86 g+32%
Why is GO 2550 4k better than X5.2?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Max field of view120° vs 145°+21%
- Depth33 mm vs 31 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | 86 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 145° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | HyperSmooth | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
