- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M40R vs XMIC
Lipa AT-M40R vs Nilox XMIC
What AT-M40R does better (2) and where XMIC wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is AT-M40R better than XMIC?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 8 MP3×
Why is XMIC better than AT-M40R?
XMIC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 56 g |
| Width | — | 30 mm |
| Height | — | 59 mm |
| Depth | — | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 8 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 900 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
