- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M82TR 6K vs 7
Lipa AT-M82TR 6K vs National Geographic 7
What AT-M82TR 6K does better (3) and where 7 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Video7.4
9.8Photo5.9
4.2Ruggedness9.3
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than 7?
- Max video resolution6K vs 5K
- Photo resolution50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+29%
Why is 7 better than AT-M82TR 6K?
- Weight300 g vs 95 g3.2×
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 15 m
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 300 g | 95 g |
| Width | — | 63 mm |
| Height | — | 33 mm |
| Depth | — | 46 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 15 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 6K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.78" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.36″ |
| Photo resolution | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
