LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. 7 vs XMIC

National Geographic 7 vs Nilox XMIC

What 7 does better (3) and where XMIC wins (2) — every spec side by side.

National Geographic 7
National Geographic · 20247
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
vs
Nilox XMIC
Nilox · 2025XMIC
2 advantages≈ $90
7.4Video8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

7XMIC
63 × 334630 × 5941
7XMICDifference
Height33 mm59 mm−26 mm
Width63 mm30 mm+33 mm
Depth46 mm41 mm+5 mm
Weight95 g56 g+39 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 7 better than XMIC?

  1. Photo resolution20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
  2. Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  3. Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%

Why is XMIC better than 7?

  1. Weight95 g vs 56 g+69%
  2. Depth46 mm vs 41 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Nilox XMICNilox XMIC≈ $90
Design & durability
Weight95 g56 g
Width63 mm30 mm
Height33 mm59 mm
Depth46 mm41 mm
Waterproof without case15 m—
Video
Max video resolution5K5K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps60 fps
Timelapse / hyperlapseYes—
Sensor & photo
Sensor size1/2.78"—
Sensor size (optical format)0.36″—
Photo resolution20 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.5—
Max field of view170°—
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
Screens
Front screenYes—
Main screen size2″2″
TouchscreenYes—
Battery
Battery capacity1,050 mAh900 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Storage & features
microSD card slotYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare