- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 7 vs 9S Cube
National Geographic 7 vs Rollei 9S Cube
What 7 does better (5) and where 9S Cube wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
79S Cube
| 7 | 9S Cube | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 33 mm | 45 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 63 mm | 54 mm | +9 mm |
| Depth | 46 mm | 38 mm | +8 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 100 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 7 better than 9S Cube?
- Waterproof without case15 m vs 0 m
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 9 MP2.4×
- Weight95 g vs 100 g+5%
- Aperturef/2.5 vs f/2.8+12%
Why is 9S Cube better than 7?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
- Sensor size (optical format)0.36″ vs 0.4″+11%
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.1″+5%
- Depth46 mm vs 38 mm+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 95 g | 100 g |
| Width | 63 mm | 54 mm |
| Height | 33 mm | 45 mm |
| Depth | 46 mm | 38 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 15 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 21 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 240 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.78" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.36″ | 0.4″ |
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 9 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.1″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
