- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 7 vs GO 2600
National Geographic 7 vs Trevi GO 2600
What 7 does better (3) and where GO 2600 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is 7 better than GO 2600?
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
Why is GO 2600 better than 7?
- Waterproof without case15 m vs 21 m+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 95 g | — |
| Width | 63 mm | — |
| Height | 33 mm | — |
| Depth | 46 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 15 m | 21 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.78" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.36″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | — |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
