LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. 7 vs GA400

National Geographic 7 vs WOLFANG GA400

What 7 does better (3) and where GA400 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

National Geographic 7
National Geographic · 20247
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ $130
vs
WOLFANG GA400
WOLFANG · 2023GA400
8.9Score
1 advantage
Higher score
7.4Video6.4
5.9Photo8.3
9.3Ruggedness7.6

Why is 7 better than GA400?

  1. Max video resolution5K vs 4K
  2. Waterproof without case15 m vs 8 m+88%
  3. Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×

Why is GA400 better than 7?

  1. Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+29%
Specifications

Side by side

Design & durability
Weight95 g—
Width63 mm—
Height33 mm—
Depth46 mm—
Waterproof without case15 m8 m
Video
Max video resolution5K4K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps60 fps
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Sensor size1/2.78"—
Sensor size (optical format)0.36″—
Photo resolution20 MP20 MP
Aperturef/2.5—
Max field of view170°170°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)6-Achsen Stabilisation
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Front screenYes—
Main screen size2″2″
TouchscreenYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity1,050 mAh1,350 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Webcam mode—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare