- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ACAM51BK vs XMIC
Nedis ACAM51BK vs Nilox XMIC
What ACAM51BK does better (2) and where XMIC wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
ACAM51BKXMIC
| ACAM51BK | XMIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41 mm | 59 mm | −18 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 30 mm | +29 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 41 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 345 g | 56 g | +289 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ACAM51BK better than XMIC?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Depth31 mm vs 41 mm+32%
Why is XMIC better than ACAM51BK?
- Weight345 g vs 56 g6.1×
- Max video resolution4K vs 5K
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 345 g | 56 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 30 mm |
| Height | 41 mm | 59 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Max field of view | 140° | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
