- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ACAM51BK vs SL3 4K
Nedis ACAM51BK vs Patona SL3 4K
What ACAM51BK does better (0) and where SL3 4K wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is ACAM51BK better than SL3 4K?
ACAM51BK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SL3 4K better than ACAM51BK?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Main screen size2″ vs 3″+50%
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 345 g | — |
| Width | 59 mm | — |
| Height | 41 mm | — |
| Depth | 31 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | 140° | 140° |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 3″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
