- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ACAM51BK vs 9S Cube
Nedis ACAM51BK vs Rollei 9S Cube
What ACAM51BK does better (2) and where 9S Cube wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
ACAM51BK9S Cube
| ACAM51BK | 9S Cube | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41 mm | 45 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 54 mm | +5 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 38 mm | −7 mm |
| Weight | 345 g | 100 g | +245 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ACAM51BK better than 9S Cube?
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 21 m+43%
- Depth31 mm vs 38 mm+23%
Why is 9S Cube better than ACAM51BK?
- Weight345 g vs 100 g3.4×
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+17%
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 9 MP+6%
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.1″+5%
- Max field of view140° vs 170°+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 345 g | 100 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 54 mm |
| Height | 41 mm | 45 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 38 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 21 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 240 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.4″ |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 9 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | 140° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.1″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
