- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ACAM51BK vs GO 2550 4k
Nedis ACAM51BK vs Trevi GO 2550 4k
What ACAM51BK does better (0) and where GO 2550 4k wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Video4.9
2.3Photo5.2
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
ACAM51BKGO 2550 4k
| ACAM51BK | GO 2550 4k | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41 mm | 43 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 60 mm | −1 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 31 mm | = |
| Weight | 345 g | 86 g | +259 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ACAM51BK better than GO 2550 4k?
ACAM51BK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is GO 2550 4k better than ACAM51BK?
- Weight345 g vs 86 g4×
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Max field of view140° vs 145°+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 345 g | 86 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 41 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 140° | 145° |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
