- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Mini-SE vs C200 Pro
Nilox Mini-SE vs SJCAM C200 Pro
What Mini-SE does better (3) and where C200 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is Mini-SE better than C200 Pro?
- Weight56 g vs 78 g+39%
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.3″+54%
- Max field of view170° vs 135°+26%
Why is C200 Pro better than Mini-SE?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 5 m
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+33%
- Aperturef/2 vs f/1.6+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 56 g | 78 g |
| Width | — | 68 mm |
| Height | — | 34 mm |
| Depth | — | 26.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 5 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/1.6 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 135° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 4.6 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
