- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Mini-SE vs C400
Nilox Mini-SE vs SJCAM C400
What Mini-SE does better (1) and where C400 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is Mini-SE better than C400?
- Max field of view170° vs 154°+10%
Why is C400 better than Mini-SE?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+39%
- Weight56 g vs 54 g+4%
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.29″+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 56 g | 54 g |
| Width | — | 68 mm |
| Height | — | 32 mm |
| Depth | — | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.36″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | 6-Achsen Stabilisation, HorizonSteady |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.29″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 4.8 Wh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 512 GB |
