- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Mini-SE vs C400 Pocket
Nilox Mini-SE vs SJCAM C400 Pocket
What Mini-SE does better (2) and where C400 Pocket wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Video6.8
4.0Ruggedness4.0
Why is Mini-SE better than C400 Pocket?
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.3″+54%
- Aperturef/2 vs f/3+50%
Why is C400 Pocket better than Mini-SE?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+39%
- Weight56 g vs 54 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 56 g | 54 g |
| Width | — | 68.5 mm |
| Height | — | 32.1 mm |
| Depth | — | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/3 |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 170 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
