LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. XMIC vs Platinum

Nilox XMIC vs Patona Platinum

What XMIC does better (1) and where Platinum wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Nilox XMIC
Nilox · 2025XMIC
1 advantage≈ $90
vs
Patona Platinum
Patona · 2026Platinum
7.0Score
3 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
8.4Video7.6

Why is XMIC better than Platinum?

  1. Weight56 g vs 66 g+17%

Why is Platinum better than XMIC?

  1. 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  2. Photo resolution8 MP vs 64 MP8×
  3. Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Specifications

Side by side

Nilox XMICNilox XMIC≈ $90
Patona PlatinumPatona Platinum≈ $1107.0
Design & durability
Weight56 g66 g
Width30 mm—
Height59 mm—
Depth41 mm—
Waterproof without case—0 m
Waterproof with housing—30 m
Min operating temperature—-10 °C
Max operating temperature—50 °C
Video
Max video resolution5K5K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps120 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps120 fps
Sensor & photo
Sensor size—1/2.86"
Sensor size (optical format)—0.35″
Photo resolution8 MP64 MP
Aperture—f/2
Max field of view—120°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation system—Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)
Electronic image stabilisation—Yes
Screens
Main screen size2″2″
Battery
Battery capacity900 mAh—
Battery life (recording)—120 min
Connectivity
Wi-Fi—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slot—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare