- Clippertoday
- Compare
- XMIC vs AT907
Nilox XMIC vs Pora&Co AT907
What XMIC does better (2) and where AT907 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is XMIC better than AT907?
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
Why is AT907 better than XMIC?
AT907 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 56 g | — |
| Width | 30 mm | — |
| Height | 59 mm | — |
| Depth | 41 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | — |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
