- Clippertoday
- Compare
- XMIC vs 9S Cube
Nilox XMIC vs Rollei 9S Cube
What XMIC does better (2) and where 9S Cube wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
XMIC9S Cube
| XMIC | 9S Cube | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 59 mm | 45 mm | +14 mm |
| Width | 30 mm | 54 mm | −24 mm |
| Depth | 41 mm | 38 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 56 g | 100 g | −44 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XMIC better than 9S Cube?
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- Weight56 g vs 100 g+78%
Why is 9S Cube better than XMIC?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 240 fps4×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+17%
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 9 MP+6%
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.1″+5%
- Depth41 mm vs 38 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 56 g | 100 g |
| Width | 30 mm | 54 mm |
| Height | 59 mm | 45 mm |
| Depth | 41 mm | 38 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 21 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 240 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.4″ |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 9 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.1″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
