- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 9S Cube vs SJ4000 Dual Screen
Rollei 9S Cube vs SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen
What 9S Cube does better (4) and where SJ4000 Dual Screen wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Video4.9
4.0Photo6.6
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
9S CubeSJ4000 Dual Screen
| 9S Cube | SJ4000 Dual Screen | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45 mm | 59.2 mm | −14.2 mm |
| Width | 54 mm | 29.8 mm | +24.2 mm |
| Depth | 38 mm | 41 mm | −3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 9S Cube better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%
- Depth38 mm vs 41 mm+8%
Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than 9S Cube?
- Photo resolution9 MP vs 16 MP+88%
- Waterproof with housing21 m vs 30 m+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | — |
| Width | 54 mm | 29.8 mm |
| Height | 45 mm | 59.2 mm |
| Depth | 38 mm | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 21 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.4″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 9 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2.1″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
