- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 9S Cube vs GO 2550 4k
Rollei 9S Cube vs Trevi GO 2550 4k
What 9S Cube does better (4) and where GO 2550 4k wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Video4.9
4.0Photo5.2
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
9S CubeGO 2550 4k
| 9S Cube | GO 2550 4k | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45 mm | 43 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 54 mm | 60 mm | −6 mm |
| Depth | 38 mm | 31 mm | +7 mm |
| Weight | 100 g | 86 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 9S Cube better than GO 2550 4k?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Main screen size2.1″ vs 2″+5%
- Max field of view170° vs 145°+17%
Why is GO 2550 4k better than 9S Cube?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Photo resolution9 MP vs 16 MP+88%
- Weight100 g vs 86 g+16%
- Depth38 mm vs 31 mm+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | 86 g |
| Width | 54 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 45 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 38 mm | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 21 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.4″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 9 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Max field of view | 170° | 145° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2.1″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
