- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C10 vs C400
SJCAM C10 vs SJCAM C400
What C10 does better (5) and where C400 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C10C400
| C10 | C400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 29 mm | 32 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 57 mm | 68 mm | −11 mm |
| Depth | 25 mm | 25.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 46 g | 54 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C10 better than C400?
- Battery capacity2,630 mAh vs 1,250 mAh2.1×
- Weight46 g vs 54 g+17%
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 16 MP+50%
- Sensor size (optical format)0.37″ vs 0.36″+4%
- Main screen size2.51″ vs 2.29″+10%
Why is C400 better than C10?
- Max field of view150° vs 154°+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 46 g | 54 g |
| Width | 57 mm | 68 mm |
| Height | 29 mm | 32 mm |
| Depth | 25 mm | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.7" | 1/2.8" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.37″ | 0.36″ |
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 150° | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation, HorizonSteady | 6-Achsen Stabilisation, HorizonSteady |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.51″ | 2.29″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,630 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 4.8 Wh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 512 GB |
