- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C100 vs C200
SJCAM C100 vs SJCAM C200
What C100 does better (2) and where C200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C100C200
| C100 | C200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 26 mm | 34 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 68 mm | −8 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 26.5 mm | −6.5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C100 better than C200?
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 24 fps+25%
- Depth20 mm vs 26.5 mm+32%
Why is C200 better than C100?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 40 g | — |
| Width | 60 mm | 68 mm |
| Height | 26 mm | 34 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 26.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 5 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Min operating temperature | — | -20 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 60 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 24 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.36″ |
| Max field of view | — | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | — | 1.28″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery energy | 2.7 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 150 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
