- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C200 Pro vs SF230
SJCAM C200 Pro vs Surfola SF230
What C200 Pro does better (2) and where SF230 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is C200 Pro better than SF230?
- Waterproof without case5 m vs 0 m
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
Why is SF230 better than C200 Pro?
- Weight78 g vs 43 g+81%
- Main screen size1.3″ vs 2.4″+85%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
- Max field of view135° vs 170°+26%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 78 g | 43 g |
| Width | 68 mm | — |
| Height | 34 mm | — |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 5 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | — |
| Max field of view | 135° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1.3″ | 2.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | — |
| Battery energy | 4.6 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
