- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C200 vs SF230
SJCAM C200 vs Surfola SF230
What C200 does better (3) and where SF230 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is C200 better than SF230?
- Waterproof without case5 m vs 0 m
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
Why is SF230 better than C200?
- Main screen size1.28″ vs 2.4″+88%
- Max field of view154° vs 170°+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 43 g |
| Width | 68 mm | — |
| Height | 34 mm | — |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 5 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 60 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 24 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.36″ | — |
| Photo resolution | — | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 154° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1.28″ | 2.4″ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
