- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C300 Pocket vs SF230
SJCAM C300 Pocket vs Surfola SF230
What C300 Pocket does better (2) and where SF230 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Photo9.2
4.0Ruggedness4.0
Why is C300 Pocket better than SF230?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
- Weight31 g vs 43 g+39%
Why is SF230 better than C300 Pocket?
- Main screen size1.33″ vs 2.4″+80%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
- Max field of view154° vs 170°+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 31 g | 43 g |
| Width | 68.5 mm | — |
| Height | 32.1 mm | — |
| Depth | 25.5 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 154° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 1.33″ | 2.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,800 mAh | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
