- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C400 Pocket vs SF230
SJCAM C400 Pocket vs Surfola SF230
What C400 Pocket does better (1) and where SF230 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Photo9.2
4.0Ruggedness4.0
Why is C400 Pocket better than SF230?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
Why is SF230 better than C400 Pocket?
- Main screen size1.3″ vs 2.4″+85%
- Weight54 g vs 43 g+26%
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 54 g | 43 g |
| Width | 68.5 mm | — |
| Height | 32.1 mm | — |
| Depth | 25.5 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/3 | — |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1.3″ | 2.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 170 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
