LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. SJ11 Active vs SJ4000 Dual Screen

SJCAM SJ11 Active vs SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen

What SJ11 Active does better (4) and where SJ4000 Dual Screen wins (3) — every spec side by side.

SJCAM SJ11 Active
SJCAM · 2023SJ11 Active
8.8Score
4 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
vs
SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen
SJCAM · 2023SJ4000 Dual Screen
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ $45
6.4Video4.9
4.8Photo6.6
9.6Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

SJ11 ActiveSJ4000 Dual Screen
64.5 × 44.530.529.8 × 59.241
SJ11 ActiveSJ4000 Dual ScreenDifference
Height44.5 mm59.2 mm−14.7 mm
Width64.5 mm29.8 mm+34.7 mm
Depth30.5 mm41 mm−10.5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SJ11 Active better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?

  1. Waterproof without case30 m vs 0 m
  2. 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  3. Battery capacity1,300 mAh vs 900 mAh+44%
  4. Depth30.5 mm vs 41 mm+34%

Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than SJ11 Active?

  1. Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  2. Photo resolution12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
  3. Max field of view154° vs 170°+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Design & durability
Width64.5 mm29.8 mm
Height44.5 mm59.2 mm
Depth30.5 mm41 mm
Waterproof without case30 m0 m
Waterproof with housing—30 m
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps30 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps120 fps
H.265 / HEVCYesYes
Timelapse / hyperlapse—Yes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution12 MP16 MP
Aperturef/2.3—
Max field of view154°170°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemGyroskopischer Bildstabilisator—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
Screens
Front screenYesYes
Main screen size2.33″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Audio
External microphone support—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity1,300 mAh900 mAh
Battery energy4.9 Wh—
Battery life (recording)140 min—
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Webcam modeYesYes
Live streamingYes—
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare