- Clippertoday
- Compare
- SJ8 Pro vs Muvi KX-1
SJCAM SJ8 Pro vs Veho Muvi KX-1
What SJ8 Pro does better (4) and where Muvi KX-1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SJ8 ProMuvi KX-1
| SJ8 Pro | Muvi KX-1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41 mm | 40 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 62.5 mm | 52 mm | +10.5 mm |
| Depth | 28.8 mm | 26 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Weight | 85 g | 67 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SJ8 Pro better than Muvi KX-1?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Main screen size2.33″ vs 1.8″+29%
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+14%
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
Why is Muvi KX-1 better than SJ8 Pro?
- Weight85 g vs 67 g+27%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
- Aperturef/2.8 vs f/2.5+12%
- Depth28.8 mm vs 26 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 85 g | 67 g |
| Width | 62.5 mm | 52 mm |
| Height | 41 mm | 40 mm |
| Depth | 28.8 mm | 26 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2.33″ | 1.8″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery energy | 4.6 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
